So, you are ready to buy a car. That’s great. You know what you need?
A list of the world’s most reliable, safe, cost-effective, and well-regarded cars.
Does such a list exist, you ask? Why yes, yes it does. I’ve put together an extensive list of only the most reliable cars in the United States. I then included data on safety, cost to own, cost to purchase, cost to fuel, and critical reception. The data was pulled from six different websites (truedelta.com, nhtsa.gov, kbb.com, edmunds.com, fueleconomy.gov, and usnews.com). I then (1) consolidated some scores where doing so made sense, (2) made some adjustments for oddities in the data, (3) ranked the entire data set using a modified Wilcoxon method (which allowed me to compare cars across metrics), and (4) coded a system that weights the ranks depending on how you preference a certain metric (which allows me to preference safety over cost for example, and see which cars rank better). The final product contains over 3,720 data points.
But enough of that, let’s look at the results!
Cheapest to Purchase
You can buy cheaper cars, but none of them will be as reliable as these inexpensive cars. If you need to get into a car and have very little money up front, stick with one of these. If you are looking for the most cost-effective option, look at the next list.
Rank | Make | Gener-ation | Reliab-ility | Safety Score | Purchase Price | Annual Fuel Cost | True Cost | Critical Reception |
1 | Honda Accord | 2001 - 2002 | 56% | 4.20 | $2,082 | $1,450 | $24,228 | 8.7 |
2 | Ford F-150 | 2000 - 2003 | 39% | 4.94 | $2,890 | $2,150 | $33,086 | 7.9 |
3 | Toyota Tundra | 2000 - 2006 | 45% | 3.46 | $2,960 | $2,050 | $33,677 | 8.1 |
4 | Hyundai Elantra | 2007 - 2010 | 53% | 4.35 | $4,676 | $1,250 | $20,659 | 7.9 |
5 | Honda Insight | 2010 - 2014 | 22% | 4.35 | $5,620 | $900 | $21,741 | 7.5 |
6 | Mazda MX-5 Miata | 2006 - 2015 | 42% | Not Rated | $6,144 | $1,850 | $26,787 | 8.4 |
7 | Pontiac Vibe | 2009 - 2010 | 55% | 4.45 | $6,311 | $1,300 | No Data | 7.6 |
8 | Honda Fit | 2009 - 2014 | 47% | 4.55 | $6,340 | $1,200 | $24,235 | 9.1 |
9 | Toyota Camry | 2007 - 2011 | 47% | 4.94 | $6,398 | $1,400 | $24,602 | 8.3 |
10 | Toyota Matrix | 2009 - 2013 | 54% | 4.45 | $6,398 | $1,250 | $22,928 | 7.2 |
Most Cost Effective
Edmunds.com has a metric they call the “True Cost to Own.” This metric evaluates the following metrics: Depreciation, Insurance, Financing, Taxes and Fees, Fuel, Maintenance, Repairs, and Federal Tax Credits. Combined with the Kelley Blue Book Purchase Price, these two metrics give us a great idea of the cheapest cars to own overall. If you want to reduce car expenses to the greatest possible degree, snag one of these cars.
Rank | Make | Gener-ation | Reliab-ility | Safety Score | Purchase Price | Annual Fuel Cost | True Cost | Critical Reception |
1 | Hyundai Elantra | 2007 - 2010 | 53% | 4.35 | $4,676 | $1,250 | $20,659 | 7.9 |
2 | Honda Accord | 2001 - 2002 | 56% | 4.20 | $2,082 | $1,450 | $24,228 | 8.7 |
3 | Honda Insight | 2010 - 2014 | 22% | 4.35 | $5,620 | $900 | $21,741 | 7.5 |
4 | Toyota Matrix | 2009 - 2013 | 54% | 4.45 | $6,398 | $1,250 | $22,928 | 7.2 |
5 | Honda Fit | 2009 - 2014 | 47% | 4.55 | $6,340 | $1,200 | $24,235 | 9.1 |
6 | Honda CR-Z | 2011 - 2012 | 26% | 3.50 | $7,291 | $1,000 | $20,762 | 7.9 |
7 | Toyota Corolla | 2009 - 2013 | 46% | 4.15 | $6,857 | $1,200 | $22,542 | 7.8 |
8 | Honda Accord | 2008 - 2012 | 54% | 4.55 | $6,851 | $1,350 | $24,042 | 8.7 |
9 | Toyota Camry | 2007 - 2011 | 47% | 4.94 | $6,398 | $1,400 | $24,602 | 8.3 |
10 | Mazda MX-5 Miata | 2006 - 2015 | 42% | Not Rated | $6,144 | $1,850 | $26,787 | 8.4 |
Safest
If you value safety highly, these are the cars for you. It may make sense to splurge on a remarkably safe car if you drive a ton, find yourself around crazy drivers a lot, are a crazy driver yourself, or drive other people around frequently.
Rank | Make | Gener-ation | Reliab-ility | Safety Score | Purchase Price | Annual Fuel Cost | True Cost | Critical Reception |
1 | Subaru Legacy | 2013 - 2014 | 51% | 5.00 | $11,824 | $1,350 | $32,102 | 7.5 |
2 | Toyota Camry | 2007 - 2011 | 47% | 4.94 | $6,398 | $1,400 | $24,602 | 8.3 |
3 | Ford F-150 | 2000 - 2003 | 39% | 4.94 | $2,890 | $2,150 | $33,086 | 7.9 |
4 | Acura TL | 2009 - 2011 | 15% | 4.94 | $10,131 | $2,100 | $32,447 | 8.5 |
5 | Honda Civic | 2012 | 36% | 4.75 | $7,851 | $1,200 | $25,677 | 8.3 |
6 | Kia Soul | 2014 - 2017 | 46% | 4.75 | $9,717 | $1,300 | $27,056 | 8.0 |
7 | Toyota Corolla | 2014 - 2017 | 56% | 4.75 | $11,305 | $1,150 | $27,132 | 7.4 |
8 | Honda Civic | 2016 - 2017 | 32% | 4.75 | $15,712 | $1,000 | $27,807 | 8.7 |
9 | Honda Accord | 2013 - 2015 | 49% | 4.75 | $11,867 | $1,200 | $29,701 | 8.0 |
10 | Subaru Outback | 2013 - 2014 | 50% | 4.75 | $14,532 | $1,350 | $32,012 | 8.8 |
Most Well Received by Critics
The Critical Reception score evaluates metrics that I don’t include elsewhere in the data. It pulls only a portion of the available scores on US News reports – specifically the Critics’ Rating, Performance, and Interior Score – and averages them out for an overall critical reception score. My goal is to reduce the “wow, this is a nice car” feel down to a simple comparable metric. However, you’ll notice the Honda Fit is #1, which makes little sense when you compare that to the Acura, Lexus, or Porsche. The Honda Fit benefits from a remarkably high “Critics’ Rating” of 9.8 – almost perfect! Presumably this is because the Fit is an almost perfect subcompact, low cost car, while the Porsche Boxster, in the eyes of the critics, either has stiffer competition or a little more room to grow.
Rank | Make | Gener-ation | Reliab-ility | Safety Score | Purchase Price | Annual Fuel Cost | True Cost | Critical Reception |
1 | Honda Fit | 2009 - 2014 | 47% | 4.55 | $6,340 | $1,200 | $24,235 | 9.1 |
2 | Acura MDX | 2010 - 2013 | 46% | 4.74 | $14,870 | $2,500 | $38,724 | 8.8 |
3 | Lexus RX | 2010 - 2015 | 50% | 4.61 | $16,178 | $1,750 | $37,747 | 8.8 |
4 | Porsche Boxster | 2000 - 2004 | 58% | Not Rated | $8,565 | $2,100 | $69,578 | 8.8 |
5 | Subaru Outback | 2013 - 2014 | 50% | 4.75 | $14,532 | $1,350 | $32,012 | 8.8 |
6 | Honda Accord | 2008 - 2012 | 54% | 4.55 | $6,851 | $1,350 | $24,042 | 8.7 |
7 | Honda Accord | 2001 - 2002 | 56% | 4.20 | $2,082 | $1,450 | $24,228 | 8.7 |
8 | Honda Civic | 2016 - 2017 | 32% | 4.75 | $15,712 | $1,000 | $27,807 | 8.7 |
9 | Infiniti M | 2011 - 2013 | 33% | 4.25 | $15,121 | $1,550 | $45,970 | 8.8 |
10 | Toyota Prius | 2010 - 2011 | 41% | 4.15 | $8,283 | $750 | $26,276 | 8.6 |
Most Reliable
Reliability is a big deal. Not only is it expensive to repair cars, repairs eat up a lot of time: take the car in, wait around, maybe secure alternative transportation, etc. Even worse, an unreliable care can mean missed meetings and obligations. If your schedule is very sensitive, or you bill a lot of money per hour, having the most reliable car around may make the most sense, because for some people, time can be a lot of money.
Rank | Make | Gener-ation | Reliab-ility | Safety Score | Purchase Price | Annual Fuel Cost | True Cost | Critical Reception |
1 | Toyota Prius v | 2012 - 2017 | 8% | 4.50 | $11,685 | $900 | $30,276 | 8.3 |
2 | Toyota Camry | 2015 - 2017 | 8% | 4.50 | $14,566 | $1,300 | $29,791 | 8.2 |
3 | Acura TL | 2009 - 2011 | 15% | 4.94 | $10,131 | $2,100 | $32,447 | 8.5 |
4 | Lexus NX | 2015 - 2017 | 17% | 4.50 | $25,727 | $1,800 | $47,153 | 8.3 |
5 | Honda HR-V | 2016 - 2017 | 19% | 4.50 | $16,629 | $1,200 | $29,893 | 8.0 |
6 | Toyota Prius c | 2012 - 2017 | 19% | 4.00 | $9,212 | $750 | $27,303 | 8.0 |
7 | Honda Insight | 2010 - 2014 | 22% | 4.35 | $5,620 | $900 | $21,741 | 7.5 |
8 | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | 2012 - 2014 | 23% | 4.00 | $13,345 | $1,800 | $48,106 | 8.3 |
9 | Honda CR-V | 2015 - 2016 | 23% | 4.25 | $17,471 | $1,250 | $30,289 | 8.3 |
10 | Toyota Prius | 2016 - 2017 | 24% | 4.50 | $17,384 | $700 | $33,580 | 8.3 |
Overall Best
Finally, this is a list of cars with the best broad performance across all metrics. I equally ranked all metrics besides Annual Fuel Cost (since this is already represented in the True Cost to Own metric). If all you want is a rock-solid car on every category, get one of these.
Rank | Make | Gener-ation | Reliab-ility | Safety Score | Purchase Price | Annual Fuel Cost | True Cost | Critical Reception |
1 | Honda Fit | 2009 - 2014 | 47% | 4.55 | $6,340 | $1,200 | $24,235 | 9.1 |
2 | Toyota Camry | 2007 - 2011 | 47% | 4.94 | $6,398 | $1,400 | $24,602 | 8.3 |
3 | Acura TL | 2009 - 2011 | 15% | 4.94 | $10,131 | $2,100 | $32,447 | 8.5 |
4 | Honda Civic | 2012 | 36% | 4.75 | $7,851 | $1,200 | $25,677 | 8.3 |
5 | Honda CR-V | 2010 - 2011 | 42% | 4.61 | $9,887 | $1,550 | $25,881 | 8.5 |
6 | Honda Accord | 2008 - 2012 | 54% | 4.55 | $6,851 | $1,350 | $24,042 | 8.7 |
7 | Honda Civic | 2016 - 2017 | 32% | 4.75 | $15,712 | $1,000 | $27,807 | 8.7 |
8 | Honda Insight | 2010 - 2014 | 22% | 4.35 | $5,620 | $900 | $21,741 | 7.5 |
9 | Ford F-150 | 2000 - 2003 | 39% | 4.94 | $2,890 | $2,150 | $33,086 | 7.9 |
10 | Toyota Prius | 2010 - 2011 | 41% | 4.15 | $8,283 | $750 | $26,276 | 8.6 |
Thoughts
That’s it! I anticipate updating this list periodically. I may also embed the entire data set into the website so you can play around with the weight and rankings yourself if you are interested.
If you have any thoughts, or would like to see additional data included in an updated list, let me know! I’ll see what I can do.
Thanks for reading
Efficient Financials is a simple little site focused on helping streamline your finances so you can focus on things that matter.
Sometimes this means solid recommendations (like our recommended financial services or our recommended investment strategy (temporarily down (hint: John C. Bogle).
Sometimes this means general thought experiments for major purchases (like our post on the safest, most cost effective car or how to remain in the iOS ecosystem for as little per year as possible).
If you are into the nitty gritty of investments, check out our sister site: www.informedfinancials.com.
Be First to Comment